I see we are right back
to the typical Republican election hoopla of who will be the candidate to fill
the town board seat after Mickey Orvis resigned. In terms of the wind issue it doesn’t really
matter much. Hirschey already has a super majority. The 5th seat either adds to an
already Republican super majority or if a pro wind person wins they will be
powerless just like Orvis. In terms of
the wind issue concerning the Comp Plan and Zoning and other upcoming wind decisions
this is a lot of hoopla over nothing.
But here is the absolutely
hilarious and hypocritical part. Wiley
at JLL blog and the Republicans have suddenly given any new candidate a litmus
test with the following questions.
Do you support the
Village/Town Comp Plan?
Do you support the
Town of Cape Vincent zoning laws?
Do you support
local rule by the Town Board who is duly elected by the citizens?
Typical
CV Republican hypocrisy!!!! And why is
that so?????
Because
Wiley’s Republican candidates prior to the 2011 election didn’t have to answer any
such litmus test thrust upon them, nor would they allow any such specific
questioning of their stance. I tried many times to get all three Rep.
candidates to outline a specific stance on wind development in CV. There was NO response from those candidates
in any specifics as Wiley is demanding now of any new candidate. We were all supposed to go on blind faith
that there was a “plan” and to get in line behind it. A plan no candidate was told to define in
specific terms.
Hell
…even Wiley himself doesn’t hold himself up to this standard and completely and
blindly support the new CV zoning law.
It was he after all that recently said on his blog that the town may have made dangerous and unnecessary concessions
to BP and VFW.
Looks
like the old saying “do as I say not as I do”!!!
Maybe
a new candidate would think for themselves and not support the current zoning law and comp
plan and would in fact like stronger protections against wind development in
Cape Vincent.
Or
maybe a candidate might think for themselves and disagree with this irrational support of solar
energy in both documents that needs the same subsidies as wind, still has large
impacts when used on a commercial scale, and has WORSE energy production
capacity factors than wind, and costs more.
Maybe
some new candidate would think for themselves and like more detailed research on gas hydrofracking before we outright ban it with
no polling data or science. Because there was virtually none. May be some candidate would see the serious
inconsistency of banning hydrofracking and its impacts, and not industrial wind
which is a similar threat to the community.
Maybe
some candidate would think for themselves and like stronger property protections against
industrial wind development for people in the CV interior where the current
board members and zoning committee have unfairly shoved back the impacts of
industrial wind energy.
Maybe
some candidate would not support this zoning setback game and would prefer to
not appease the Article X process, but rather prohibit turbines outright, and
also pass a resolution opposing Article X and wind development in the Lake as
this current board refuses to do.
Wiley’s
questions are the epitome of hypocrisy, and the typical partisan, blind, group think get on the band wagon partisan crap that has
absolutely no depth and stifles critical
thinking. I think any candidates that are confronted with this BS should start
thinking for themselves and tell Wiley
and the Republican party they are not going to be held hostage by this group
think nonsense.
I
don’t care if we have a woman of a man on the board. I want someone who can think for themselves
and see a little deeper into the realities and subtleties in the wind issue
that Wiley is desperately trying to distort with this partisan crap.
Michelle
Oswald might be a good person and possibly a good town board member, but she
would have to do significantly better than this. I have only met and talked to her briefly,
but if she allows herself to be swept up
into this blind Republican partisan nonsense then she is not
responsible, not thinking critically or clearly, AND not what we should have on
our town board. And if she is to be a representative for women in CV or beyond by
being the first woman on the CV town board, then to it would be a sad thing for
her to be swept up in Wiley’s partisan group think agenda or simply fall in
line with the new board and show she has no backbone to think for herself. If there is now a gender component to argue in
CV politics then I don’t think that
represents the women’s cause very well to suck up to anyone else’s blind litmus test on anything, especially some guy with
a Republican blog who thinks he can set the agenda for women in CV or anybody
else. That to me seems to significantly defeat that whole purpose if gender is
part of the argument now. And BTW, isn’t
it the Republicans that are supposedly waging a war on women????
There
are serious questions to be asked and dealt with like I outline above, and I
would hope any new candidate would have some back bone to challenge and ask
questions of the new zoning and comp plan, and new board instead of rolling over to the same old same
old partisan group think.
We
don’t need another clone from either party or either gender, pro or
anti wind sitting there just
taking up space and warming a seat using somebody else’s script like the one Wiley wrote!
That is the job of an actress, not a serious
govt. official.
No comments:
Post a Comment