So the other day I asked the question on this blog as to where is the Property Value Assurance
Guarantee (PVA) in our zoning law that was such a point of discussion several
months ago and further back? Mr.
Schneider and other’s on our town board
were promoting this idea heavily.
Mr. Schneider before he was elected to the town board even presented a
letter to our town boards endorsing the idea.
The CV blogosphere immediately jumped on board indicating this was the
best thing since sliced bread to mitigate the industrial wind property value impact. And of course anyone who dared not march lock
step (like myself) and started applying some actual reasoning to the idiocy of
this idea was immediately marginalized.
The noted property appraiser Michael McCann that
reviewed the CV Wind Economic Committee’s report was suggesting a PVA as well. A
quote from Mr. McCann.
“The applicant
has not agreed to implement any reasonable measures to mitigate the aesthetic
impacts of the WET that result in value loss.
Property
Value Guarantees are effective tools, if carefully designed to leave property owners
“whole”, and even the LBNL author now recognizes the validity of a PVG.”
And a side note here. I think it is extremely misguided to look
at this situation of property values and
assume that stuffing some wind company cash into someone’s pocket is going to
make them “ whole” after having to sell and leave a location they love and have
so much emotional attachment to. To me
that represents a cold hearted major flaw in the mentality of people who can
only measure being whole as being compensated financially. After all in the end it is the emotional
values in your property that make it valuable to you. The view, the memories, the emotional
stability of place and importance of the setting and belonging. I think it is really absurd to believe that can simply be replaced with a bag of
cash from the wind developer.
Now I noted this AM on both CV blogs, Pandora’s and
JLL, are once again raising the property values question as related to
industrial wind development and quoting McCann.
But I don’t see a word about the PVA from them unless you read well into
McCann’s own report. The blogs are not
addressing the obvious absence of what once was being so heavily recommended by
the “experts” And geee it’s a funny thing that after all
this property value hoopla and all this group think PVA hoopla that there is NO
PVA in the new CV zoning laws. So once
again I will ask…what ever happened to that?????? A lot of time was spent on the CV Wind Economic
Committee about property values and they came to essentially the same conclusion
McCann did on a PVA. They supported the idea.
Under recommendations number 5 and 6 in the CV
wind economic report:
5.
Require property value protection assurance.
6.
Require a buyout plan for properties negatively impacted.
For some reason the PVA vanished. And rightly so because it was and still is a
really screwy notion.
Now I am not stupid.
I understand the implications of industrial wind on property values and
the part it plays. But when we going to grasp
the to the realization of the far more important issue going on right in front
of our noses.
We need to get our heads out of our checkbooks and
realize that if all these wind developers get their way regionally we will have a front row seat and be witness to
the wholesale mass environmental
destruction of a beautiful and unique
region on a historical scale and it could all be endorsed by our State
on behalf of these developers. Do you have any concept at all of the overwhelming
corporate destructive precedent that could be set here right on our
doorsteps??? THAT is the story and the insanity of what is happening here.
Yet we put blinders on and approach this from a
ridiculous town by town myopic setback approach, and worry about our individual
property values. This is like worrying
about the location and value of a deck chair on the Titanic!
What are you going to say to your grandkids if they
ask were where you and what where you doing when much of NNY and the once
beautiful, and environmentally precious and unique Golden Crescent was destroyed by an
industrial wind development tax scam and scandal?
Are you going to tell them “Well geee I was
primarily worried about my property and counting the cash the
wind developer gave me to move out so they could continue destroying the area!!!! Sounded like a good idea at the
time!!!”
There has been talk about revolution and noisy
protest against Article X if BP brings it here. In the context of the
environmental disaster that could occur I think that is exactly what should
happen.
No comments:
Post a Comment