You can use the link below to read a brief WDT article.
http://www.watertowndailytimes.com/article/20140612/NEWS03/140619624
STOP, The regional wind energy industrialization of one of New York State's most beautiful and environmentally sensitive areas, the 1000 Islands of the St. Lawrence River and the Golden Crescent of Eastern Lake Ontario. If you don't think you are seeing the most recent posts click on the current month in the archives to the right.
The reasons stated in the WDT are some of the reasons given to Hirschey's Secretary - just not all the reasons. Think about it.....McSherry is keeping 2 of his 3 town positions. Why give up that one unless the problem is with Hirschey? Tina' s original explanation makes total sense.
ReplyDeleteI am guessing you are right. And this is an interesting and ironic turn of events, and here is why.
ReplyDeleteIf you know the CV wind history you will know that in 2008 Mr. Macsherry was on the Rienbeck wind law committee. In 2009 when that draft law was finished, he sat down in a PRIVATE meeting with Rienbeck and both wind developers and let the developers go over the law line by line and give their objections. Macsherry was not on any board...he was simply a volunteer appointed by Hirschey and Hirschey as part of WPEG was not invited to Rienbeck and Macsherry's little get together with the wind developers.
This would be before anyone in the public had seen the law, or there was a public hearing where they could review the law and make objections or revisions.
I guess when Macsherry is left out of private meetings he gets his underwear in a bunch!!!
Stalking is a continuous process, consisting of a series of actions, each of which may be entirely legal in itself. Technology ethics professor Lambèr Royakkers defines cyberstalking as perpetrated by someone without a current relationship with the victim. About the abusive effects of cyberstalking, he writes that:[5]
ReplyDelete[Stalking] is a form of mental assault, in which the perpetrator repeatedly, unwantedly, and disruptively breaks into the life-world of the victim, with whom he has no relationship (or no longer has), with motives that are directly or indirectly traceable to the affective sphere. Moreover, the separated acts that make up the intrusion cannot by themselves cause the mental abuse, but do taken together (cumulative effect).
5:37 You might want to be very careful.
ReplyDeleteFirst, I would suggest you use something other than Wikipedia for your legal advice.
Second if you want to talk about cyberstalking etc then you might want to consider that your anonymous electronic message left here on this blog ( with a traceable ISP) is clearly meant to intimidate and create fear and then hide your identity.
And YOU have left several such comments over time to try to intimidate!