A few days ago I put a post here called “A Dangerous Premise” (see below). This fantasy is promoted by the Cape Vincent
JLL blogger Rick Wiley. Here is a prime
example of his premise. A quote from his
recent blog post.
“So, Article 10
did not go well for bp. And yes it worked for our community because fellow
optimists made the law work for them. The threat of that law charged us up.
This optimist and optimistic friends didn’t ignore the opportunity. Then,
frustrated by too many Article 10 hoops set up in a public arena,
bp announced that they were selling their American industrial wind interests
and at the same time abandoning Cape Vincent "because the community didn’t
want it".
This belief by
Wiley he has been spreading around for some time and may be directly
responsible for seasonal people changing their vote back to their home communities
believing it’s all over and we won and there is no more threat. Wiley told us”
wind was dead”. I believe this was a direct reason for some
pro wind people to get elected back to the CV town board leaving us vulnerable
to another industrial wind attack in the future. The season votes were lacking! Even Wiley complained about it.
As you can see
the bulk of the premise is that we “defeated” BP through participation in the Art.
10 process and writing a “good” wind law.
The Art 10 process “worked” he claims.
Well let’s take
this fantasy apart shall we.
First go look
at the NYPSC Art 10 website regarding the BP/CV matter.
Look at the actual
“record” you will see in much the official correspondence from the town to the
PSC and many of the public comments that they were mostly complaints about BP
and how they were acting in the process.
You will see complaint after complaint about the process and the
frustration by the town and their lawyer.
The bottom line
is...this WAS NOT GOING WELL FOR THE TOWN as BP manipulated and controlled the
process and left the town twisting in the wind!.
Additional
evidence is this comment from one of those letters where the town after months
in this process doesn’t think the “opposition” is having any meaningful input.
Below is the quote...
“The community of Cape Vincent has
spoken in near harmony. We have listened to BP representatives for several years,
but a steady series of non-answers leaves us with many unaddressed concerns about the
project's impact on their health, safety and welfare. When does this opposition actually have a "meaningful"
impact in the certification process?”
So for Wiley to somehow conclude that this all went
well in CV is pure unadulterated nonsense and heavy PR spin...with NO facts, mind
you, to back it up! It’s nothing more
than a desperate attempt to validate what he thinks supposedly was the right
approach to fight wind. And because the
Art 10 process was NEVER COMPLTED in CV he now has the luxury to reinvent
history to his whims!
It would be just like playing a game where the
opposing team calls the game and was actually ahead and you make up a story that
somehow you won. It’s a delusion and a
dangerous one at that!
Wiley quotes some obscure British business source as
proof we defeated BP. The source says BP
left CV after lots of opposition. It
DOES NOT say they left BECAUSE of the opposition. It is a statement of sequential
events...not necessarily correlating those events...more PR spin!
The fact is BP left due to financial reasons and they
were getting out of the wind business world wide...not just in CV. AND several other local wind projects lagged
as well at the same time due to the possible end to federal tax breaks and financial
considerations.
And it cracks me up that Wiley concludes the Art 10 process
didn’t go well for BP. Not sure what planet
he was on, but in some ways it went very well for BP. Like at the end where to assist BP in attempting
to sell their CV project the Art 10 judge extended the time for BP with no solid deadline in the process to see if
they could get a sale. Then he would not
even guarantee that if a sale occurred the new owner would have to start
over. This left the town waiting and “twisting
in the wind” and the town and their lawyer complained about the process and how
BP was manipulating it.
And Wiley continues to think that participating in the Art 10 process and
writing a good wind law is THE path to take.
But he has NO proof to back this claim ZERO! The Art 10 process was never completed in CV
so we don’t have a clue what the result would have been...and there hasn’t been
one siting under Art 10 as of yet so we don’t know how those will come out
either...NO PROOF.
But the real kicker against Wiley and his Art 10/ wind
law fantasy is Dennis Vacco an attorney
now involved in NYS wind battles and who was a former NYS attorney general
saying the Art 10 system is “UNTESTED as of yet. Exactly what I have been saying for a long
time. At least Vacco is living in
reality and exposes Wiley’s delusion!!!
These are the FACTS you can look up yourself in the
NYPSC record I linked above.
Wiley and some of his flock in CV are living under a
dangerous delusion of fantasy, rewriting history, and spin to make them look
good...when the facts simply don’t back up this delusion.
No comments:
Post a Comment