5:16 If you think this is just Faulknham and Chase
you are missing the big picture.
Talking
about the possibility of Faulknham not liking Chase (which I believe is
correct) and how the Hirschey crew deals with people who don't follow marching
orders, let me add a few details that show the bigger picture...and pattern.
First,
obviously I have been a target of that wrath for some time now when I parted
ways with WPEG and the Hirschey Republican crowd. Not whining about it...that is just fact when
you don't play by their script.
My
observation is that it isn't just Faulknham.
I'm betting it was Bob Brown and Macsherry of the planning board and
probably others across the town govt because Chase chose to dare to question
things particularly on the solar zoning screw up of summer 2013 that I
uncovered and voted against approving the permits on that matter. There are other matters as well.
And BTW,
some people think it was Hester Chase who fed me information to uncover that
mess, but that is outright false. I first
learned of it when Mrs. Grogan a friend of mine called me asking if I knew of a
public hearing where a solar project was proposed by her neighbor. I said I would look into it. From there I started digging and looking at
minutes and videos and making some calls to zoning officials and figured out
they had screwed up big time and this solar project was illegal.
Now what you
have to understand is that CV super. Hirschey (unknown to me at that time) also
had a solar project up and running that was also illegal by our zoning
law. Which he chose to take down as a
result.
So there was
a lot at stake here, and our zoning officials knew it, and apparently by the later
nutty action of the ZBA and planning board and others across town govt
including the town attorney it became obvious they were covering their butts on
this mess trying to sanitize it and justify this fiasco which even made the
newspaper. They even had to go into a
town board executive session on this mess and that session didn’t just include
the town board, it had other zoning officials in it. They even attempted to exclude Ms. Chase but
were unsuccessful.
It was such
a mess and something had to be done to sanitize it they needed an executive
session with the town attorney mind you!
But instead
of following the “cover your rear end” script Chase chose to try to support
open and good govt and support an obviously innocent and aggrieved town
citizen. She started asking questions and ultimately voted against the permits
on the one solar project.
And Hirschey
on his own took down his solar project temporarily. He told me so himself in a visit to my cottage.
When he showed up knowing I had uncovered a big mess that went deep into
CV zoning, and telling me personally about his solar project I knew this was a
fiasco. He rarely visits my CV residence, even when I was in WPEG. And when I did a FOIL request of town records
for his solar project permits etc he met me at the door basically asking what I
was going to do with the records.
So as I said
there was a lot at stake, and I think it highly likely Ms. Chase pissed off a
number of the key Hirschey players across town govt. and then she raised
concerns about how ZBA and PB records were accessed and who controlled what.
Look at
these minutes of the ZBA hearing on 10/7/13. These are on the town website
under the ZBA minutes. They reveal a lot
of other stuff as well about this zoning mess.
You can see where Macsherry of the PB is disgruntled
and suggests Chase and I and others should reveal any emails on the subject at
hand. He is pissed at me because I
uncovered a real zoning mess with his board and the ZBA and Chase has not been
willing to cave into pressure.
Richard
Macsherry – as past Chair of the Planning Board, offered to speak to ZBA board members
as to why he feels Ms. Chase is conflicted on this issue. He stated that Mr.
Pundt has, over the past several weeks, made comments on the adequacy of the
process. He shared that any emails sent to any board members from either Mr.
Dave LaMora or Mr. Art Pundt on this issue should be seen by all board members.
He said he believed that
individuals
were contacted to influence a vote.
So why is
Macsherry, and as I remember Mr. Brown as well of the planning board, even at
this particular ZBA meeting? I don’t
think that is a regular event.
Because it
is basically a public hearing on an appeal of the solar zoning fiasco they and
other zoning officials had created and even swept the supervisor into with his
own illegal solar project. A lot is at stake.
They need to
make sure Ms. Chase and I and others raising real uncomfortable questions are
marginalized.
Now think
about … if you have been to various town meetings over past years, have you
ever been to one where a town officer from another board shows up and asks
another board to actually dig into the private emails of citizen???
That is feakin
bizarre behavior!!! Oh and it just so
happens those citizens don’t agree with them on other zoning matters and have
been saying so rather loud and publicly.
What a coincidence!!!
And let me
tell you…the very LAST thing Macsherry would want if he had a clue was to go
through my emails of the past few years.
It would get real ugly for some members of the Hirschey crowd!
And Mr.
Macsherry should be careful about what he was requesting. He should have
considered that when I found out about this mess he was the FIRST person in
town govt I contacted and had a lengthy PRIVATE phone conversation about
it. I also had a few subsequent private emails
and personal conversations with him on this zoning matter. Was I trying to influence his vote? Maybe he should have recused himself from the
entire issue as well!
If anything should
be revealed it should have been the emails and phone calls among all the town
officials who got caught up in this zoning mess and spent many weeks scrambling
very questionably trying to justify it.
It even resulted in a secret executive session with the town attorney and
with town board and some CV zoning
officials. That is rare…and bizarre!
See the
minutes below from a town board meeting of
where they go into executive session.
All it says is the session was about ” personal matters”. I believe NYS laws indicate they need to at
least outline the basics of what they are going into executive session
for. Well apparently not this time! It’s
pretty vague.
“Councilman Byrne made a motion to adjourn to Executive Session at
6:40pm to discuss personnel issues and legal matters with Attorney Gebo,
seconded by Councilwoman Oswald.
Councilman Byrne made a motion to return from Executive Session and
open Regular Meeting at 7:30pm, seconded by Councilman Bragdon.”
What was so
secret they could not discuss it publicly???
I also believe they tried to keep Ms. Chase out of this executive
session. Imagine that.
Considering
what I have said above, when Ms. Chase was up for re-appointment my opinion it was pay back time!!!
Oswald
asking for fairness in town appointments goes a lot deeper than the
technicality of how appointments are handled.
And I think she knows that.
Now do I
have anything else to base this on. Well
yes I do from personal experience.
In 2012 when
the new zoning law was being worked on in committee, I was not on board with
the way it was being done or where it was going. It was locked in stone from the get go as to
what the Hirschey crew wanted. Of course
I was commenting on this often on my blog and others which I know pissed them
off.
But I still
sent the committee, headed by Bob Brown, detailed input on CD’s since I had a
fair amount of experience in CV zoning by this time. There was one CD for each
committee person.
Brown and
several others absolutely refused to look at them and shoved them across the
table. I was told this by somebody who
was there to observe this behavior and got pretty upset and notified me. The apparent reasoning was Brown simply
didn’t like me and wasn’t going to take any of my input.
Geee…sound
familiar????
The
astonishing thing to me was after asking for input from the community that he
would single out and punish one citizen simply because he wasn’t happy with
what they were saying…again…sound familiar???
So at a
minimum…when you think about Faulkinham and Chase at odds...it’s probably goes
way beyond that to Brown and Macsherry as well as others.
But does it
end there? No!
Somebody
should talk to John Byrne who has been a real Hirschey loyalist…at least in
public. Note that he ultimately used a
lame “community healing” excuse to side with Oswald about appointments contrary
to Hirschey. I’m not sure Mr. Byrne is
all warm and fuzzy about how things are run at times. He just doesn’t have the brass to really
question Hirschey.
Of course on
the other hand you have Councilman Bragdon who outright said in the last
meeting he defers to Hirschey. Of course
he is probably weighing his future as deputy supervisor and maybe supervisor.
Unknown to
many Byrne has been on the wrong side of the Hirschey script a couple times and
had to pay.
He once
declared publicly on a blog when he wanted to run for town board the second
time around he was against industrial wind in CV which was a no no in the Hirschey WPEG camp . It was also my stance since day one. This got him into campaign trouble. Suddenly the Hirschey /WPEG machine went into
their famous marginalization scheme and tried also to connect him to me.
Byrne
indicated to me that he felt he was being socially and politically
marginalized, and the Hirschey crew was indicating he was probably not
electable.
Of course
Bynre had a sudden epiphany about his political future and how Hirschey and the
Republicans were connected to it, and he suddenly started playing by the
script. And as we now know he had big
NYS assembly dreams he probably saw going down the tubes if he didn’t play by
the right rules.
Unknown to
some is that in 2009 Byrne wanted to run for supervisor. Called me and asked if I would support
him. I said I would if he took a no wind
development stance. But Hirschey stepped
in and edged him out behind the scenes for the supervisor job. Byrne was livid, but played by team rules
anyhow.
And on an
interesting side note, I got word from a reliable source who had talked to
Byrne about a zoning concern Last summer, that Byrne off handedly said he
thought zoning and who and how it was controlled “was out of control.” Interesting!!! The why did you vote to approve the law John,
and sit by silent in the 2013 solar zoning fiasco?
The case of
Faulknham maybe not liking Ms. Chase and what Ms. Oswald I think is eluding to
about appointments is only scratching the surface of how people are handled if
they don’t follow the script.
And in the
past both Wiley and the JLL bog and the Pandora blog have been mouth pieces and
tools to make sure people get effectively marginalized if not on script.
Something I
have been trying to alert people in CV to for some time now.
In many
respects the solar zoning fiasco of 2013 that caught up supervisor Hirschey as
well and his entire zoning establishment was a far bigger deal and reached
deeper into the fundamentals of the CV govt and its supposed leaders than most
people realize. And what really fries
them is it is all in the record on video or minutes to see…as are their actions
of appointments now.
I am glad
that Ms. Oswald has made an issue of it.
You are seeing why in the past when there was an empty board seat and
Oswald was available Hirschey and Bragdon were actually toying with the idea of
appointing Paul Aubertine instead.
The solar
zoning fiasco of 2013 demonstrated what type of people and leaders they are
when they had their backs against the wall.
Instead of just admitting mistakes were made and openly correcting them
(big fundamental zoning mistakes) in my opinion big egos got in the way and
they opted for the cover our butts mode. Even the WDT paper figured something
wasn’t right.
You think
Chase got interviewed and questioned when her reappointment came up, because
Faulknham (and others) didn’t like her and her actions.
In my
opinion you can bet your ass that’s the case.
And you can
bet they would probably like to marginalize her further as they have done with
others.
But guess
what, there is a record and you can read it right here to be an informed CV
citizen and maybe keep this kind of political nonsense in check.
.
And if you knew even more of the back story, you would be really horrified....Thank you for trying to enlighten citizens. So Sad they're not interested!
ReplyDeleteMaybe you should enlighten us.
ReplyDeleteYou are a real crazy jerk, Art.
ReplyDeleteWhy do you suppose Hirschey and his board selected Oswald to fill out the remainder of Schneider's term if she is such a fly in the ointment?
ReplyDeleteYou appear to be a very angry troubled person. You should ask for help. I think there might be some who you hate so much that they might be in danger from you. You have dwelled on the same topic for years now and that is not healthy.
ReplyDeleteMay you somehow find peace and joy.
ReplyDeleteLife does not always go our way.
There is a lot of solar in the world and it is
unfortunate that others having it would upset you so.
Try to be emotionally well over your situation.
Try not to look at them. That should help.
12:20
ReplyDeleteAhhhh ...it might surprise you to know I live in a passive solar house My wife and I built ourselves nearly 30 years ago.
My objection to the solar issue in Cape Vincent is not so much the solar as it is the way it was handled, particularly in a couple cases were the solar zoning was manipulated and distorted for the solar agenda, and in a place that is one of the least sunniest places in the nation.
9:39 What is really troubling is the facts as to what some of our town officers did on the solar zoning issue.
ReplyDeleteAnd it is appropriate now because some of those people are up for reappointment.
5:54
ReplyDeleteI find it interesting that you feel someone who is engaged in the democratic process by asking questions and questioning the action of our town officials when they are not acting appropriately and have in my opinion distorted the zoning laws... that you would characterize that person as a jerk.
That says a hell of a lot more about YOU that it does me.
Keep in mind the things I am questioning are all in the record and on video.
And oh by the way 5:54 and 12:20 You might want to keep in mind that as a result of the actions or our zoning officers and town govt a CV citizen was denied her rights twice by the CV govt.
ReplyDeleteI guess you are OK with that!
Seems the real jerks are the ones who stand by while a fellow citizen is denied basic rights. Those are the people who need help!
Anonymous
ReplyDeleteWho give a rats ass about you trouble makers? What have you ever contributed to Cape except bitch and tell tall stories?
And yes I am ok with that. Solar is all over the place.
11:43
ReplyDeleteThat is a brilliant statement!!!
Solar is all over the place???? Really So that means it is viable and works well, especially in the cloud NE. I'm sure you don't have a clue one way or the other.
I think what it really means is it is supported by generous tax subsidies. Oh and BTW
Rape, domestic violence, robberies and murders are everywhere too. So by your inane logic that is justified too.
Nice try!
Last night's ZBA meeting was opened by Falkenham (who at that point was not even a member of the ZBA- much less chairman). He then delayed the public hearing until the call from Bragdon telling him of his reappointment. Check out the video.
ReplyDeleteYer a loser, Artie.....and you always
ReplyDeletewill be a loser.
Losers get marginalized.
I thought someone said on your blog that appointments had to be made by a resolution voted on by the town board. Was there a special town board meeting where this resolution was passed?? Or did the board vote by a phone message??
ReplyDeleteI am not sure on the answer to your question. Although yes on the fact that the town board does vote to appoint the various candidates for various appointed positions.
ReplyDeleteIf you look at the town website calendar it appears there was an organizational meeting of the TB on Jan 5th, and on the same day was the ZBA meeting.
I don't know for sure but I am guessing the TB voted on the ZBA and other appointments, and then notified Faulknham he was reappointed. At some point soon on the town website there should be minutes of the 1/5 TB meeting that should indicate what took lace at the 1/5 TB organizational meeting.
The minutes should be listed under the document center and town board minutes. It should be listed as the first TB meeting of 2015.
It would be interesting to know if there were any other candidates that applied for the open positions.
To finish this discussion, the board did hold a meeting on Jan.5 and voted to reappoint the incumbent ZBA and Planning board members. There were no interviews as no one, other than the incumbents, applied. Much to do over nothing.
ReplyDelete